Jigsaw Trading Blog

Trading advice – A traders’ dilemma – true story

I often have traders call me to discuss their trading issues. Today I heard from a trader whose problem was a common one. It just wasn’t the problem he thought he had. For the purposes of this story, let’s call him Vitaly – because that’s his real name.

What was Vitaly’s problem? Let’s first take a look at some of his trading stats…

  • Percentage Profitable – 79.59%
  • Number of winning trades – 429
  • Max consecutive winners – 90
  • Average Winning Trade – $55.31
  • Number of losing trades – 110
  • Max Consecutive losers – 16
  • Average Losing Trade – $106.95

For full disclosure, I’m not a trading coach but I do talk to hundreds of traders every year. Some professional traders and some retail traders. Some are profitable and many struggling. Vitaly is a customer and uses our tools daily. He’s one of the customers that’s kept in touch about his progress as he’s been developing as a trader.

Looking at the stats in isolation is tough but we can do some number crunching. His losers are bigger than his winners, so first, we have to take a look at the win rate to make sure his winning percentage isn’t just because of a skew in risk:reward.

What skew?

Let’s consider a system, where winners were getting 10 ticks and losers were losing 20 ticks. Entering at random, you would expect 66% of the trades to be winners. As the target is closer than the stop, probability would see you hitting the target first 66% of the time. The system would break even before fees because and would have no edge in it. 

So is Vitaly suffering from R:R skew?

Considering the size of his winners and losers, he’d need to beat a 65% win rate to show there was edge/profitability in what he’s doing. He’s way above that. So it appears that there is merit in what he’s doing. It’s also working over a good size sample, so it’s not as if we are just looking at a handful of trades. 

So what’s his problem?

His problem is this… His trades are scalps taking 3-5 ticks profit on Crude Futures and he takes many trades a day. Stops are the concern. He has an emergency stop at 30 ticks BUT he actively manages his trades with order flow. In other words, he will exit a losing trade when he feels there is aggressive selling. Price simply isn’t the only factor in his decision-making. In effect, he has no hard stop loss. Typically, he’s out at 6-8 tick loss but sometimes it’s just over 10 ticks. 

And this is a problem for one reason only. He’s sharing this information with other traders who tell him “You aren’t doing it right”, “You have to have a fixed stop”, “30 ticks is way too far”, “that will never work”.  

And his problem – he’s listening to them!

The traders’ dilemma – listening to other people

Vitaly is actually doing really well. He’s found a way to trade that works for him. He’s been doing it long enough that his performance is not the result of chance.  His method of managing trades would not shock anyone in the world of professional trading. After all, so what if price moves against you a few ticks, if selling is still quite light? 

His emergency stop hasn’t been hit this year. In other words, he’s very disciplined and gets out when the market shows it’s not going his way.

People telling him he needs to have a fixed stop at 10 ticks, simply do not understand what he is doing. He is actively managing his trades. The people putting in 10 tick stops and then sitting there like a deer in headlights watching the market go down and stop them out – they are the one’s doing it wrong. It’s not as if stops are bad but letting them get hit when you already know your trade is failing, that’s just giving money away.

The problem is that Vitaly will fail as a trader if he seeks validation from other non-professional traders. This is where a lot of traders fail. They take advice from people they meet online that are complete strangers. They take advice from people that don’t have the same set of trading skills they have (in this case the order flow reading skills). They take advice from people that aren’t trading profitably. None of this advice will be helpful.

The market – the best advice you can get

Vitaly already has the best advisor – the market. It’s telling him that what he is doing is right. As a trader, it’s easy to lack confidence. It’s also easy to think the “grass is always greener” and think that someone else’s method would be easier/more rewarding than your own. That’s why charlatans advertise “trade the easy way” and “97% win rate”.

Vitaly is a disciplined trader but now he needs to be disciplined in terms of whom he listens to. My advice to him was very simple:

“STOP LISTENING TO PEOPLE TELLING YOU THAT YOU ARE DOING IT WRONG!”

Hopefully, he’ll listen. It’s OK to take trading advice but when you start showing a profit, it’s time to listen to yourself because you are already way ahead of most retail traders at that point.

 

FREE BONUS: Take a look into the decision-making process of professional traders with this video training series that helps you make smarter trading decisions. (Article continues below)

Order Flow itself is simply information. Just like charts, it can be used in a number of ways, some good and some bad. But let's first break down order flow into it's components so we all agree what we are talking about:

Order Executions/Tape Reading - This aspect is the real flow of orders. It's the information we see in Time & Sales, Footprint Charts, Cumulative Delta. It is looking at market orders, either as they execute or historically. I guess this is the "true order flow". Every trade is a buy and a sell. We look at market orders because we consider them to be more aggressive. When someone trades with a market orders, they are giving up a price to get an instant fill. Limit orders on the other hand just lazily sit there waiting for a market order to hit them. Often these are market makers with no directional conviction. So we see market orders as being more significant.

But we don't use these in isolation.

Volume Profile/Positions - The tape reading part helps us assess various things like momentum, traders getting stuck, balance of trade BUT the volume profile helps us understand where people are positioned and likely to get stopped out. I sometimes call this "Order Flew". It's important to know when trades will be "washed out" - for example - if we have a volume cluster on the S&P500 Futures and the market moves up 100 points and back down to it, it's unlikely short term traders on either side that were positioned there will still be there. But recent, nearby volume helps us assess areas of positions.

Market Depth - The bids and offers, the lazy passive orders waiting to be hit. This is part of the story but in terms of overall importance, I'd put it at around 20% at most. For example - if you return to the high of the day on any market, the offers will be quite large directly above the high. It means nothing at all. It's just a quirk of the market. It does not help you tell if a price will hold. On the other hand, if you see large depth and as we approach it, we see more added to the depth in front of that price, it means others are front running that depth and that is a useful bit of information.

This is the key - it is all just information. Just like price charts are information. When people look at Order Flow, they consider it to be a technique more than a set of information. They look for things like iceberg orders and decide to make a one rule trading system to fade every iceberg, For these people - yes, order flow trading is overrated because they are trying to ignore everything else going on in the markets and construct a trading system a chimp could execute.

For those looking to improve a decent trading approach, the best thing to focus on in Order Flow is momentum. Once you can read momentum you can:

  • Avoid getting into positions when momentum is against you.
  • Confirm trades are working after entry when momentum goes your way.
  • Exit trades in profit when momentum fades.

That's perhaps the easiest way to use order flow because momentum is easier to read. It's about the market continuing to do what it's already doing. On the other hand, reading a turn in the market with order flow takes a higher level of skill and a little longer to learn.

Order flow can't put lipstick on a pig. It won't help you 'improve' something that doesn't work anyway, which is why whenever someone calls me, the first thing I ask is what they are currently doing and we discuss whether they need a reset or whether it will actually help.

When Jigsaw started back in 2011 - we were one of the first in the space and certainly had the best education. It was always going to attract the underbelly of the trading education/tools world and now we see stuff out there that is so complex but so impressive and futuristic that new traders are drawn to it like moths to a flame.

So here's my advice when looking at Order Flow

  • Order Flow can't improve something that doesn't work.
  • Order Flow can be used on it's own, without charts to enter and exit the market but you also have to be able to recognize different market states that need different/altered setups. There is nothing magical about this.
  • Don't start jumping at shadows and take 50 trades an hour in your first week looking at Order Flow, be selective. It can be exciting to see cause and effect play out in front of you for the first time but don't overtrade.
  • Do drills to learn how to read it before you trade it.
  • Markets can only go up and down. Don't overcomplicate it. If you have too many Order Flow tools on your screen - you will not be able to make consistent decisions. Less is more.
  • Take time to choose a market with a pace you like. Interest rates might send you to sleep, the DAX might give you a heart attack.

It is hard to see how a set of information could be overrated. It is true that some methods of presenting this information are better than others. It is also true that some people simply get on better with different tools (e.g. Footprint vs DOM).

There's a middle ground between complexity and simplicity that will leave you making consistent decisions where you improve over time. For those people, Order Flow will be way underrated because they will be the one's getting the most out of it.

Those that jump in with both feet on day one and those that have 100 different tools up, for those, it's a painful experience.

Keep it simple and manageable. Start with momentum reading and build from there. You will never look back.

Read more articles about trading

6 Misconceptions That Blind Traders —And How to Overcome Them

6 Misconceptions That Blind Traders —And How to Overcome Them

6 Misconceptions That Blind Traders —And How to Overcome Them Published on: November 22, 2024 If you’ve been trading for a while, you’ve probably felt stuck. Spinning your wheels, trying harder, and not getting anywhere is frustrating, right? Maybe you’ve convinced...

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright Jigsaw Trading © 2025

Privacy Policy

Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.

Jigsaw Leaderboard
Note that the Jigsaw Leaderboard contains a mixture of SIM/Live Traders. For many traders, you can click by their name to see the trades along with the SIM/Live designation.

The following is a mandatory disclaimer for SIM Trading results:

HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN; IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM. ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK OF ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT TRADING RESULTS.